DaddyBlogger.com

Parental and Civil Rights Alliance Launched by A Child's Right

A Child's Right recently launched the Parental and Civil Rights Alliance.  The rare opportunity to form a Meetup Alliance is by invite only and not open to the general public.  Quite the honor! In less than two days this Alliance already has 26 organizations that have joined with over 53,000 collective members!  Incredible results in a short period of time and we expect the Parental and Civil Rights Alliance to be listed in the Top 10 Largest Meetup Alliance list.

Please join the Parental and Civil Rights Alliance.  Great way to pull more people into your local group.  26  groups and growing!

Only those who want to start a group or already have one (via Meetup, Facebook, Google, Yahoo, active website, etc.) can join the Parental and Civil Rights Alliance right now. If you don't want to be a group organizer, you can find an existing group on the internet, Meetup, Facebook, MySpace, etc and ask them to join the alliance.  Or start your own group right here in the Parental and Civil Rights Alliance.

If you have a leadership role in a local group or organization you should join the Parental and Civil Rights Alliance for the following benefits:
1)  The Parental and Civil Rights Alliance is a fantastic tool to help parental and civil rights activists all over the country to meet and organize in person.
2)  Network with similar organizations and groups to increase turnout at your local events.
3)  Learn from the successes and failures of local groups.
4)  Give your local organization an additional web presence with link.  Thousands of people visit the main page for Meetup Alliance daily and look for a local group in their area...look at it like the yellow pages – but this is free!
5)  Increase your membership totals in your local organization.  The Parental and Civil Rights Alliance allows those who come across it on the internet to search for a local group in their area.
6)  Want to carpool to a national event?  Research local groups and consolidate resources for a successful turnout.
7)  Network with Meetup groups, Yahoo groups, Facebook groups, MySpace groups and more!
8)  Expose your next event or meeting to a national audience!
9)  Create your own group's resource page.
10)  Finally create an international coalition of parental and civil rights activists!

Creating your own Alliance is not open to the public and the chance to grow this was given to me on an invite only basis from Meetup.  They are still in a Beta run and new features will be added very soon!

Meetup Alliance is the best way for leaders of local groups to share, learn and communicate.
Joining is free and will only take a minute. Just click the link below:
http://www.meetupalliance.com/parentalrights   

The Open Door - Parent's Day

The Open Door

Note To All: Thank you for the wonderful and encouraging offline comments and responses to my previous posts. My heart is warmed in your kind words and well wishes towards my success in these articles. Special thanks to “the Biggest Daddy of them all” Robert Pedersen, whose masterful forethought brought me to this opportunity!

Big Daddy

Recently, Mr. Parker posted the following: “While I agree with your principle that it is time to find a way to assert some federal rights for fathers, the courts have historically found that under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, regulating marriage and family matters are reserved to the States. It will take a serious national dialog and effort to move in the direction of some kind of federal involvement. Interestingly enough, it may take a "marriage amendment" to the Constitution to open that door.”

Thank you for the comment!  Notwithstanding, your suggestion that there is need for legislative changes, to this I aver, but on the contrary the door is already open in the Federal Courts.
For years the Federal Courts have routinely barred Civil Rights Claims under 42 USC 1983 with Abstention Doctines, most notably the Rooker-Feldman Abstention. Without digressing too deeply into the law, Rooker barred prospective Federal litigants as state courts’ losers, seeking to appeal their losses. This is in application of 28 USC § 1257, which legislates the US Supreme Ct as the only Court authorized to hear appeals of state court’s decisions. Feldman, on the other hand, was a poor US Supreme Ct. decision that has wrecked havoc on fathers for twenty-five years. This is not the case anymore. The door has opened! Let’s walk through that door!

I. The Rooker Feldman Abstention Doctrine is Inapplicable

In Lance v Dennis, Justice Ginsberg opined at [462], “the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the court explained, includes three requirements: (1) "the party against whom the doctrine is invoked must have actually been a party to the prior state-court judgment or have been in privity with such a party"; (2) "the claim raised in the federal suit must have been actually raised or inextricably intertwined with the state-court judgment"; and (3) "the federal claim must not be parallel to the state-court claim.” 379 F. Supp at 1124;

In Lance v Dennis, Justice Stevens, in his Dissent, characterized Rooker-Feldman, “Rooker and Feldman are strange bedfellows. Rooker, a unanimous, three-page opinion written by Justice Van Devanter in 1923, correctly applied the simple legal proposition that only this Court may exercise appellate jurisdiction over state-court judgments. See Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 416, 44 S.Ct 149; 68 L. Ed. 362. Feldman, a non-unanimous, 25-page opinion written by Justice Brennan in 1983, was incorrectly decided and generated a plethora of confusion and debate among scholars and judges.  See District of Columbia [*468] Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S. Ct. 1303, 75 L. Ed. 2d 206; id. at 488, 103 S. Ct. 1303, 75 L. Ed. 2d 206 (STEVENS, J., dissenting);

Last Term, in Justice Ginsburg's lucid opinion in Exxon Mobil Corp v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp, 544 U.S. 280, 125 S. Ct. 1517, 161 L. Ed. 2d 454 (2005), the Court finally interred the so-called “Rooker-Feldman doctrine.” And today, the Court quite properly disapproves of the District Court's resuscitation of a doctrine that has [**1204] “produced nothing but mischief for 23 years.”

The US Supreme Court in Exxon-Mobile clearly opines, as this Plaintiff's Claim asserts, “no federal court has ever abstained for want of jurisdiction.” See also Lance v. Dennis, where Justice Ginsberg opines, further limiting Rooker-Feldman, again, in not applying to federal court abstention for claims “for a court's want of jurisdiction.”

Justice Ginsberg opining on Rooker-Feldman at [284], “In Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 68, L. Ed 362, 44 S. Ct. 149, the parties defeated in state court turned to a Federal District Court for relief. Alleging that the adverse state-court judgment was rendered in contravention of the Constitution, they asked the federal court to declare it "null and void." Id., at 414-415, 68 L. Ed. 362, 44 S. Ct. 149. This Court noted preliminarily that the state court had acted within its jurisdiction [emphasis added].”;

Further in Exxon-Mobile, Justice Ginsberg opining on Rooker-Feldman at [283], “Variously interpreted in the lower courts, the doctrine has sometimes been construed to extend far beyond the contours of the Rooker and Feldman cases, overriding Congress' conferral of federal-court jurisdiction concurrent with jurisdiction exercised by state courts, and superseding the ordinary application of [***461] preclusion law pursuant to 28 USC § 1738 [28 USCS § 1738]. See, e.g., Moccio v. New York State Office of Court Admin., 95 F.3d 195, 199-200 (CA2 1996). Exxon-Mobile v Saudi Basic Industires, Inc. 544 U.S. 280, 283; 125 S. Ct. 1517; 161 L. Ed. 2d 454; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2929; 73 U.S.L.W. 4266; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 206.”;

In Exxon-Mobile, Justice Ginsberg opining on Rooker-Feldman at [287], “Since Feldman, this Court has never applied Rooker-Feldman to dismiss an action for want of jurisdiction.”;
In Plaintiff's case at bar: 1) Plaintiff has filed for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief under FRCP 57 & 60, 28 USC §2201, 42 USC §1983, and other causes of action. As noted in this Court Order, Plaintiff is seeking “to declare them [State orders] Void [Ab Initio]” for want of statutory authority, i.e. for Want of Jurisdiction; 2) Plaintiff's State Orders and Judgement of Divorce were not rendered in a state of Jurisdiction, i.e. there is no “finality” or “outstanding final judgment.” A ruling without jurisdiction is a Nullity, never has Vitality under the Law - at no time in Rooker or Feldman did the Plaintiffs allege that the trial court lacked Jurisdiction to adjudicate, but rather that they claimed judgments were voidable as unconstitutional;

The US Supreme Court held in Valley v. North Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116, that courts cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are simply void, and this even prior to reversal. There is no time limit to Vacate a Void order, for once Void, it is Void forever. Fed. Rule of Civ. P. 60(b) explicitly exempts an independent action to address a Void Judgment from the one-year statutory limitation. See also: Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S.Ct. 997; Old Wayne Mut. I. Assoc. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 S.Ct. 236 (1907); Williamson v. Berry, 8 How. 495, 540, 12 L. Ed, 1170, 1189, (1850); Rose v. Himely, 4 Cranch 241, 269, 2 L.Ed. 608, 617 (1808);

The US Supreme Court held in Mitchum v. Foster, 407 US 225, that injunctive relief is permitted in a 42 USC §1983 action. “The very purpose of 1983 was to interpose the federal courts between the States and the people, as guardians of the people's federal rights - to protect the people from unconstitutional action under color of state law, “whether that action be executive, legislative, or judicial.” [Mitchum, supra, quoting] Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S., at 346.” “For these reasons we conclude that, under the criteria established in our previous decisions construing the anti-injunction statute, §1983 is an Act of Congress that falls within the “expressly authorized” exception of that law.” Supra at 243.

Again, I say, “Let’s walk through that open door!”

Big Daddy

Today, July 27, 2008 is National Parent’s Day! For all of you non-custodial fathers, who have your kids today, give them a hug for Big Daddy and the rest of us, who do not have our children this day!

MLB All-Star Game and Family Rights Reflections

As I watched the All-Star game the other night (What a long, but great game!), I reminisced about the great tradition and history of Yankee Stadium. The era of greats gone by, most of them long passed before my being graced this earth, moved me in a moment of nostalgia. I was happy that MLB decided to host this year’s game at the Old Yankee Stadium, rather than, waiting until 2010’s game at the New Yankee Stadium. As baseball goes, the next All-Star game at the Yankee’s home park should not occur for another thirty years. Sometimes the old is worth retaining. Other times, the former needs to be released and the new necessarily should be ushered in!

Well defined within our Michigan history is a family right’s movement that began thirty plus years ago with folks like Al Lebow. Al, along with others, began to challenge the Family Court’s determination in establishing one parent as non-custodial. They laid the foundation for the reform that is our agenda today. From the bottom of our hearts, we thank you Al for your years of dedication and service for our children’s sake.

Al was not alone in his endeavors. Today, thirty plus years later, Michigan’s family rights movement boasts of membership in the tens of thousands. A visit to the web shows groups meeting every day of the week. There are social programs, education programs, legal help programs and more. All for the individual caught up in Family Court! While most groups have a particular agenda- Children Need Both Parents, SplitNTwo, Get Off The Bench, A Child’s Right, Family Rights Coalition, Dads and Moms of Michigan, Fathers For Justice and the list goes on. Most of these groups have undergone a metamorphosis lately. Recently posted on a local family rights blog was the following apropos statement,
“A new generation of professionals, well educated, well trained and just the right amount of pissed off, have taken up the mantle through advocacy to dissemble corrupt government at its core! Along with, assuming the responsibility to- educate, train and mentor individuals to claim/ assert their unalienable rights whether in family courts, in states' courts, in federal courts, in states' legislatures, in federal legislature or, most importantly, at the ballot box!”

I cannot agree more. Today’s professional has put career, financial security and the pleasure principle on hold, in order to wage war against our government in its kidnapping of our children. But, we have not stopped there! We have claimed all elements of governmental corruption as our agenda. None is safe from our exposure. We have aligned with any/ all groups. We know no lines of distinction, save the people’s right to control and cause to submit those who shall be our servants- our elected officials!

In August, on the 15th and 16th, all citizens shall gather together at Upper Senate Park in our Nation’s Capital to voice both our concerns and our grievances to our US Government, to We The People and to the Public Media. Law makers, law enforcers, personalities, experts and professionals shall be in attendance. US Citizens of all genders, races, political persuasions and social economic statuses shall declare, in one collective voice, their demand for an immediate, none mitigating reform of government as we know it! Join us! Your attendance is necessary! Your input is invaluable!

For more information regarding DC Festival 2008 visit www.dcfestival2008.com

Big Daddy

Please comment. It requires NO account!

First Amendment Right to Petition

Last week I learned something from my daughter’s readings. The Constitution in its original signing did not contain any affirmative statements of our rights! Yep! The Bill of Rights, which we all know, was added as Amendments after the Constitution was written, was signed and was adopted by the thirteen colonies. Some Framers, as James Madison, were none-to-happy with these exclusions. The thought, in their exclusion, was that the Constitution assumed each of these Rights, not needing to be re-iterated as redundant. Some, though, were wise beyond their years in requiring their inclusion post the Constitution’s adoption by the states. So allow me to ask you- Do you know which aspect of which Amendment is arguably the most abused by our Government? It’s our 1st Amendment Right to Petition!

Our Constitution explicitly states in the 1st Amendment, “The Right to Petition government.” Today, that is considered over-broad. The history of this Right stretches back to England forward through our Continental Congress arriving as an assumptive given within the Constitution. Despite the arguably redundant inclusion of the affirmative Amendments of our Bill of Rights, the “Right to Petition government” was assumed, therefore, it was not fully defined in said Bill of Rights!

The Right to Petition during the era of our Continental Congress was for each and every person’s right to bring a petition of grievance before Congress. Yes, Congress! That’s the Legislative Branch folks! Once the Constitution was adopted in 1787, the Right to Petition included the Judicial Branch while continuing for the Legislative Branch. This right granted any citizen access to both the federal court and to the federal legislature for re-dress of any alleged grievance! My, how have things changed in 200+ years?

Today, We The People, must overcome Abstention Doctrines to gain access into our federal courts for re-dress of any grievance alleged against our states; notwithstanding these restrictions on our access to the federal courts, we now have no access to our legislators for said grievances. What happened? Stare Decisis! The federal courts legislated, from the bench, their own laws, which have restricted and/ or rescinded We The People’s access to both the courts and the legislature for our grievances against the states!

We The People have been robbed of our 1st Amendment Right to Petition and we aim to re-claim it back from our government. For more information regarding activist groups concerning WTP and our 1st Amendment Right to Petition click the web link http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/.

Our fundamental Right to Petition our government is foundational to our controlling our government. This was assumed and always believed by our Constitutional Framers. Our states have aggrieved our rights. And, the federal government has barred us from re-dress of these said grievances! We must assert our Right to Petition against our states!

Big Daddy

Armour Thyroid or Synthroid? Your Quality of Life Hangs in the Balance!

The following is not medical advice and only my personal experience.  Always seek the advice of a physician before making a medical decision.

My wife is a Registered Nurse and her suggestion has made a huge improvement in my life.  I was placed on Synthroid when I was 19 years old for being hypothyroid at a serious level.  It was determined that I had gone undiagnosed for a significant period of time.  This certainly was no fault of mine and had gone over and over again to the physician with complaints of hypothyroidism.  However, I was always told that someone as young as myself and being a male made it impossible for me to be hypothyroid.  My physician refused to run a TSH test.  I finally demanded a test and sure enough my TSH levels were through the roof!

I was placed on Synthyroid and showed some improvement right away, however I NEVER felt 100% like I did prior to becoming hypothyroid.  I would bring this up to physicians from time to time and they would brush my comments aside.  Sometimes they would order another TSH because of my numerous complaints that the Synthroid just wasn't cutting it.  The results of the TSH would come back normal.  My requests to get a prescription of Armour Thyroid or Thyrolar instead of Synthyroid were always met with a lecture on how Synthroid was better.  I argued the need for T3 and was told that the body naturally breaks down the T4 into T3 so there was no need for something such as Armour Thyroid.  After this scenario being repeated several time I eventually gave up on ever getting off of Sythroid and on something better.

I am now remarried to a very smart Registered Nurse who has changed my life for the better in so many ways.  I admire her at so many levels and feel truly lucky to have such a lifetime companion.  I have always complained of fatigue and being tired and no matter how many naps and the proper amount of sleep I would always feel like I needed to sleep.  Depression was ruled out as a source.  My wife suggested that we read together several books about Hypothyroidism.  We read these books together and further researched things online for several months.  After digesting all of the knowledge and patient accounts my wife strongly urged me to get off of Synthroid and on one of the T3/T4 combo treatments for hypothyroidism.

I am happy to say that the Armour Thyroid after being on it for three months has boosted my day to day energy levels.  I am always one to be extra cautious over the miracles of medicine and the first thought was perhaps this was the placebo effect.  However, the change has kept my energy levels up for several months now and the effect of T3 on the body does suggest that patients have more energy throughout the day.  The change has been significant!  I am able to focus better and my energy level stays consistent throughout the day.  I no longer feel the need for sleep except for when people normally do - at night!  My general mood has also improved tremendously mostly likely because of not feeling tired throughout the day.  I used to drink coffee to keep myself going and now I stay away from most anything that has caffeine in it.  My life has changed and I have my wonderful wife to thank for her support and encouragement to finally try something other than Synthroid.

I learned much along the way such as:

1.  Synthroid can actually cause hair thinning or hair loss.  Google it - the information is everywhere.

2.  Most patients feel better on a T3/T4 Combo treatment.  Studies are proving this to be a fact that physicians can no longer afford to ignore!

3.  Armour Thyroid provides T1, T2, and T3 which Synthroid can not!

4.  Synthroid's past shows more stability problems than compared to Armour Thyroid.

5.  If you switch to a T3/T4 combo treatment it is usually best to take it BID (twice a day) because of the fact that the T3 has a short half-life.

I can make several recommendations based on my personal experiences:

1.  Buy the book "Living Well With Hypothyroidism" by Mary J. Shomon.  I found this book to be very helpful.  I have it linked below at Amazon.com if you would like to research further and perhaps purchase this book.

2.  Keep up to date on the latest in thyroid treatment by subscribing to this newsletter.

3.  If your physician refuses to switch you from Synthroid over to a T3/T4 product - find another physician.

I hope that my experiences help others.  I have much to be thankful for in my life and my wife is clearly at the top of the list.

Armour Thyroid Synthroid Thyrolar T3 T4 hypothyroid

On the Fourth of July

-on July 4th-

As I put out the flag today, my attention returned to the recently released Four-Part Mini Series “The Adams Chronicles,” an excellent historically accurate depiction of the life of our second president John Adams. These DVDs are available at most public libraries along with another excellent biography, in written form, by David McCullough simply titled John Adams.

As I watched the mini-series, my four young children became increasingly interested in viewing it too! Soon, it was them bugging me, “Dad can we watch John Adams?” Opportunity was knocking!

Every so often, I have made it my agenda, to teach my four, ten years and younger, children some aspect of our Formative History. In February, we learned about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Prior, we have learned about the Ana-Baptists of the 1600’s and Martin Luther of the Protestant Revolution! From these lessons, we have emerged as a family which knows its history: why we believe what we believe; how it happened; what was the problem that caused it to happen; and, why we need to protect, guard and promote the effect gained from what happened!

My firm belief is that history achieved becomes history lost if we fail to teach our children the lessons learned from history. We destine them to repeat the failures of history! This holiday season take the opportunity to delve into history and to teach your children. Check out a book on the writings of James Madison or Thomas Jefferson. Rent the mini-series Adams Chronicles. Go to the library and get a book on the Constitution! Make it a family event. Make it fun, with points and awards for question and answer time! Teach your children history. Otherwise, history is destined to be lost!

Big Daddy

The Empty Tomb

- WRITTEN ON MEMORIAL DAY - by Big Daddy

Today, we celebrate the honor and the courage of our soldiers who have died defending our country and its liberties. Recently, an article ran across Yahoo that Arlington National Cemetery’s Tomb of the Unknown Soldier is empty. The bones now identified have been interred elsewhere!

The Tomb remains as a testament to the value we claim in the defense of our great country and its freedom! Many would claim such freedom is no longer worth fighting for, as our states’ governments restrict, violate and encumber our unalienable rights. Is that the reason the tomb is now empty? Is it a sign of the worthlessness of defending a country no longer free? Or, does an empty tomb represent a far different scenario?

One need not venture too remotely into history to be reminded of another empty tomb. This tomb, as most will recall, historically captured within the New Testament of the Bible, once contained the person of Jesus Christ. Today it too, remains empty.

Re-visiting the story leading up to Christ’s arrest, his incarceration, his mock trial and his subsequent execution need not be told as we all know it all too well. The movie Passion portrayed the injustice of this event, which ultimately resulted in his death.

Today, perhaps ironically, the tomb remains empty. Does this portray a symbolic objection to Christ’s message? Or, does it indicate otherwise? The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier remains empty because he was identified, in his mortal state, for whom he was when he was alive, fighting for the freedoms of this country. The Tomb of Christ remains empty today as a proof of the testament of the Father- God, who promised Christ life beyond the grave, in the power of His resurrection to a new life! The empty tomb was the proof of Christ’s resurrection to life by God!

The paradox of the story does not lie within the question- whether the tomb was truly empty or not? Rather, the seeming contradiction is in the necessity of Christ’s death to catapult him to new life! The paradox is life is only achieved through first dying to my self, trusting God for life! Christ led the way as the firstborn from the dead. The Unknown Soldier and countless others led the way in dying for the freedom of this country!

Today, the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier remains empty, not as a testament of the worthlessness of the fight for our country’s freedom, but rather as the evidence, as the Gospels of Christ indicate, that life is achieved through dying to my self while trusting God for life immortal!

Big Daddy

Pecuniary Interest

Yet again!  Excellent article by Big Daddy.

Pecuniary Interest

pe•cu•ni•ar•y / piˈkyoōnēˌerē/ • adj. formal of, relating to, or consisting of money: he admitted obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception.

As a boy growing up in the 70’s, my father taught me a valuable lesson towards understanding, often times, the seemingly peculiar chain of events of an incident. He said,
“Just follow the money trail. Then you’ll know both why and what has and will happen.”
Sage words of wisdom from the “Ole man!” These words were not any more truthful then, than they are now!

As I progressed thru my divorce proceedings, ultimately believing the judicial system would soon discover the truth about myself- contrary to how my Ex portrayed me; the truth of my ability to raise my kids- contrary to how my Ex portrayed me; and, the truth of the need for my four young children to have both parents equally involved in their lives, I became disillusioned, contrary to my formerly held belief, over the continuous Orders rendered by the Court! First in its sole custody award to my Ex. Then, its outrageous child and spousal support awards- triple the state’s mandated formula. Finally, as a death knell, an order of visitation, with my kids, for only four days per month! There were no summer vacations, only six half days of holidays and not any time on their birthdays. I was devastated. I couldn’t believe it! I fought back, only to lose again, and again.

After my third stint in the county jail, for allegedly being in Contempt for support arrearages; I guess over 80% garnishment of my check was not enough; I began to research this obvious injustice from my father’s old adage- “follow the money trail.” I soon discovered my Court’s pecuniary interest in: Making me a non-custodial parent; Ordering support triple the state’s formula; Refusing to reduce my support despite proof of my wage; Illegally editing the Official Court Record; Repeatedly incarcerating me for alleged contempt; Refusing to provide me with a Court appointed attorney as an indigent; And, Worst of all, taking my kids away from me by suspending my parenting time!

The Court had developed a racket, a term commonly applied to syndicated crime families. The law had become the mob! Back in 1995, the Federal Legislature re-worded its laws for Welfare, Food Stamps, etc. The old wording was “a mother with child(ren) who has an absent father,” to the new wording, “non-custodial parent.” The seemingly innocuous re-wording was intended to defray the huge expenses the Feds were paying out to states in Food Stamps, Welfare, etc by incentivizing states to begin collecting child support from the absent father, now called the non-custodial parent. These, seemingly were the proper things to do. Why should children be allocated tax dollars for their care instead of parents paying to care for their own children? Ah, but we missed that third variable didn’t we? “The Federal Government wanted to incentivize the states.”

The states’ incentive is called Federal Title IV Block Grant Funding. The states receive funding from the Federal Government at a 2:1 match. (There are actually additional incentives for states beyond this figure tied to their performances) These block grants go straight to the County Court. Ah ha! My father was right! “Follow the money trail.” Now the injustices made sense. Now the kidnapping of my children made sense! Now the senseless incarcerations made sense. Now the erasing of Court documents made sense. Now the falsely claimed, irrationally applied, “Best Interest of the Children” made sense! Now the state’s hypocrisy made sense!

The next time you wander into a Family Court in MI and you hear a non-custodial parent attacking the court for its pecuniary interest, remember what my “ole man” said, “follow the money trail!” Sage advice for those of us who have children!

Big Daddy